Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers.
“The excitement surrounding these tools does not come from the design itself. It comes from the collapse of the distance between description and interaction. An interface appears immediately, behavior responds instantly, and possibility becomes visible before structure exists. That is genuinely new. What is not new is the gap between something that looks finished and something that is.”
Vibe coding is accelerating the erosion of design authority →
By Michael Buckley
How top UX & Product Design teams level up →
[Sponsored] Designlab helps UX and product teams build practical capability in AI workflows, Figma, business thinking, and more. Hands-on training designed around real tools, real constraints, and real product work. Learn more.
Editor picks
- We didn’t mean to build this →
How well-meaning designers became complicit in broken systems.
By Heenesh Patel - Who are we really designing for? →
The individual User and the collective Customer.
By Daleen Rabe - We are perpetuating our own burnout problem →
The job market is brutal.
By Jessica Goldman
The UX Collective is an independent design publication that elevates unheard design voices and helps designers think more critically about their work.
Shot on iPhone in black & white →
Make me think
- Should designers “code”? →
“There’s a question that never goes away in design: should designers code? My answer has always been yes. But for a decade or so, the complexity of front-end development made it impractical for most. Thankfully, AI coding agents have reopened the door.” - AI fatigue is real and nobody talks about it →
“I want to talk about it honestly. Not the “AI is amazing and here’s my workflow” version. The real version. The one where you stare at your screen at 11pm, surrounded by AI-generated code you still need to review, wondering why the tool that was supposed to save you time has consumed your entire day.” - The machines are fine. I’m worried about us. →
“The discourse around LLMs in science tends to cluster at two poles that David Hogg identifies cleanly: let-them-cook, in which we hand the reins to the machines and become curators of their output, and ban-and-punish, in which we pretend it’s 2019 and prosecute anyone caught prompting.”
Little gems this week
Beyond the user: why design needs to widen its circle →
By Dora Czerna
Falling apples and crumbling algos →
By Eleanor Howe
Taste.md: the new tech buzzword →
By Pablo Stanley
Tools and resources
- Data models →
The shared language your AI and team are both missing.
By 👩🏻💻 Alexandra Vasquez - Designing for the invisible customer →
Are consumers’ Openclaw agents becoming the real consumers?
By Jonathan Ng - Design challenges →
You’re not supposed to get it right.
By Rita Kind-Envy
Support the newsletter
If you find our content helpful, here’s how you can support us:
- Check out this week’s sponsor and support their work too
- Forward this email to a friend and invite them to subscribe
- Sponsor an edition
The erosion of design authority, burnout problems, invisible customers was originally published in UX Collective on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.