Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers.

“Let’s take a critical view of unmoderated user testing. What if there is potential value in the interaction between humans that adds that extra layer to research findings? What if we risk missing something important when introducing remote unmoderated testing? And what happens when people get paid quite a lot to do not too much?”
The illusion of unmoderated UX testing →
By Sanna Rau
Editor picks
- When software has integrity →
Three stories of tools that refused to sell out.
By Allan MacDonald - Is addiction the responsibility of UX? →
The most effective intervention for screen addiction.
By Daley Wilhelm - The AI bubble isn’t bursting — it’s diffusing →
Or is there a bubble at all?
By Ian Batterbee
The UX Collective is an independent design publication that elevates unheard design voices and helps designers think more critically about their work.

DIA’s identity and its typeface made of pulsating particles →
Make me think
- Blame as a Service (BaaS) →
“Just as Software as a Service lets companies rent specialized technology services instead of building it, Blame as a Service (BaaS) lets companies rent scapegoats instead of becoming them.” - Good enough is a strategy →
“Your competitors aren’t building perfect code either. If you spend 6 months building the theoretically perfect architecture, they’ll ship something “good enough” in 2 months and eat your lunch. You’ll have beautiful code that nobody uses. Tech debt is the cost of moving fast enough to win.” - Needy programs →
“If you’ve been around, you might’ve noticed that our relationships with programs have changed. Older programs were all about what you need: you can do this, that, whatever you want, just let me know. You were in control, you were giving orders, and programs obeyed. But recently (a decade, more or less), this relationship has subtly changed. Newer programs (which are called apps now, yes, I know) started to want things from you.”
Little gems this week

When the dark pattern is a glaring green checkmark →
By Fabrizia Ausiello

Empathizing with a cartoon snake →
By Blake Lemons

Ornament and culture →
By Joe Alterio
Tools and resources
- Dear LLM, here’s how my design system works →
How to get production-ready code from AI.
By Oleksandra Huba - I trust you not — or How to build trust with AI products →
Trust me, I’m (not) a robot.
By Mary Borysova - Gestalt psychology in design →
Patterns your brain can’t unsee.
By Maxim Kich
Support the newsletter
If you find our content helpful, here’s how you can support us:
- Check out this week’s sponsor to support their work too
- Forward this email to a friend and invite them to subscribe
- Sponsor an edition
Unmoderated UXR, software with integrity, training LLMs on your design system was originally published in UX Collective on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.